Comments on: VIA Nano-based OpenBook vs. Intel Atom-based Asus Eee PC http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/ eee pc Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:57:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ukaav http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6323 ukaav Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:48:58 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6323 it's only benchmark. free visual benchmark methods Do you like another ultimate benchmark tool for netbook?? may be built-in vista score lol it’s only benchmark.
free visual benchmark methods
Do you like another ultimate benchmark tool for netbook??
may be built-in vista score lol

]]> By: marcus8218 http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6322 marcus8218 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:03:54 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6322 how bout you put the eee pc's atom set to maximum performance instead of power saving how bout you put the eee pc’s atom set to maximum performance instead of power saving

]]> By: fairyheli2 http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6321 fairyheli2 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:48:55 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6321 I have never liked intel based proccecors, PPC FTW!!!! I have never liked intel based proccecors, PPC FTW!!!!

]]> By: RABBIDGamfan http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6320 RABBIDGamfan Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:40:15 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6320 I've always thought that there was way too much X86 in the world, and I kind of liked it better (and found it more interesting) when you had more choice of CPU. You just don't get that in most of today's PCs. And most of today's netbooks are even worse, usually only letting you buy X86 processors from Intel. :P I’ve always thought that there was way too much X86 in the world, and I kind of liked it better (and found it more interesting) when you had more choice of CPU. You just don’t get that in most of today’s PCs. And most of today’s netbooks are even worse, usually only letting you buy X86 processors from Intel. :P

]]> By: CmdrTobs http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6319 CmdrTobs Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:39:19 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6319 Thats a big when. Given that a lot of market is data limited by there ISP it will be many years before ANY online content provider will have a 1080p only stream. so i think by the time that happens all PC's out now "will be worth shit". As long as a notebook cpu can play a 700mb Mpeg4 film video from the pirate bay that's good enough atm. Thats a big when. Given that a lot of market is data limited by there ISP it will be many years before ANY online content provider will have a 1080p only stream. so i think by the time that happens all PC’s out now “will be worth shit”. As long as a notebook cpu can play a 700mb Mpeg4 film video from the pirate bay that’s good enough atm.

]]> By: pipettes87 http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6318 pipettes87 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:22:43 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6318 That's because you're a low tech dipshit still watching pixelated shit and have absolutely no sense of future value. There are plenty of HD content online as well as blu-ray rips replacing your precious 700mb video files. Intel atom was an outdated product as soon as it came out. That’s because you’re a low tech dipshit still watching pixelated shit and have absolutely no sense of future value. There are plenty of HD content online as well as blu-ray rips replacing your precious 700mb video files. Intel atom was an outdated product as soon as it came out.

]]> By: CmdrTobs http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6317 CmdrTobs Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:06:01 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6317 lol, the amount of rage in your posts. You would never guess that we are just talking about cpu's. The point is ALL these mobile CPU units are disasterously slow. The notebook platform is for light on the go office use. High performance and battery powered is an oxymoron. 1080p video is the least of your worries when all these devices have 5200rpm or worse drives 1GB or worse memory etc.. Your angry complaints look ridiculous. Does a school run auto need alloy racing wheels? lol, the amount of rage in your posts. You would never guess that we are just talking about cpu’s. The point is ALL these mobile CPU units are disasterously slow.

The notebook platform is for light on the go office use. High performance and battery powered is an oxymoron. 1080p video is the least of your worries when all these devices have 5200rpm or worse drives 1GB or worse memory etc.. Your angry complaints look ridiculous.

Does a school run auto need alloy racing wheels?

]]> By: cheshire03 http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6316 cheshire03 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:51:11 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6316 I have used a HP mini note netbook with a 1.2 GHZ Via cpu, and I have also used a HP mini 1000 notebook with a 1.6 GHZ Intel atom cpu. Please explain why performance was a great deal faster on the netbook with the Atom CPU considering all other specs were the same concerning ram and OS? I have used a HP mini note netbook with a 1.2 GHZ Via cpu, and I have also used a HP mini 1000 notebook with a 1.6 GHZ Intel atom cpu. Please explain why performance was a great deal faster on the netbook with the Atom CPU considering all other specs were the same concerning ram and OS?

]]> By: cheshire03 http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6315 cheshire03 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:06:33 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6315 I guess you cant really explain, I was hoping for an answer. I was doing some research and the Intel Atom is faster then the Via C7 CPU, but not as fast as the 1.8 GHZ Via nano CPU. However with that said the 1.8 GHZ Via nano CPU isnt way better. Its anywhere between 1%- 25% faster, and overall being about 15% faster. I've seen Intel Atom CPU's run HD video just fine, infact one of the video responses to this video proves that. Besides, who buys a netbook to watch 1080p HD video anyway? lol I guess you cant really explain, I was hoping for an answer. I was doing some research and the Intel Atom is faster then the Via C7 CPU, but not as fast as the 1.8 GHZ Via nano CPU. However with that said the 1.8 GHZ Via nano CPU isnt way better. Its anywhere between 1%- 25% faster, and overall being about 15% faster. I’ve seen Intel Atom CPU’s run HD video just fine, infact one of the video responses to this video proves that. Besides, who buys a netbook to watch 1080p HD video anyway? lol

]]> By: RABBIDGamfan http://buyeeepc.com/eee-pc/via-nano-based-openbook-vs-intel-atom-based-asus-eee-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-6314 RABBIDGamfan Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:15:07 +0000 http://buyeeepc.com/?p=1927#comment-6314 One thing that was not revealed in this video was that the VIA laptop is using VIA's 3D hardware. These videos about the Nano seem to be more like demonstrations of VIA's mobile graphics chips than the Nano itself. One thing that was not revealed in this video was that the VIA laptop is using VIA’s 3D hardware. These videos about the Nano seem to be more like demonstrations of VIA’s mobile graphics chips than the Nano itself.

]]>